Academmia

Benefits of Security and Governance in the Cloud

az-900•mixed•

Cloud concepts

Benefits of Security and Governance in the Cloud

Short Summary

Cloud platforms provide built-in capabilities that can help you apply security controls more consistently and spot problems faster. Governance is how you set guardrails (standards and rules) so teams create and operate resources in an approved, repeatable way. This lesson clarifies the difference between security and governance and explains the shared responsibility model so you know what the cloud provider handles and what you still own.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Explain how cloud security benefits from centralized visibility and standard, repeatable controls.
  • Describe the shared responsibility model and name responsibilities you always keep (for example, data and access management).
  • Define governance in cloud computing and explain how guardrails reduce configuration drift and support compliance over time.
  • Differentiate security controls from governance controls using practical examples.
  • Identify how policy-based enforcement and auditing help detect and correct non-compliant resources at scale.

Core Concepts

Security in the cloud is about protecting workloads and data from threats. Common security goals include controlling access, reducing exposure, protecting data, and detecting suspicious activity.

A key cloud benefit is that many security capabilities are centralized. Instead of each team running separate tools and manual checks, you can apply consistent baselines and review your environment in one place. This reduces gaps caused by “everyone does it differently.”

Cloud security also follows a shared responsibility model. The provider secures the underlying cloud platform, while you secure what you deploy and configure. The split changes depending on the service type—Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), or Software as a Service (SaaS)—but your responsibilities never drop to zero. For all cloud types, you keep responsibility for your data and identities/account/access management.

Governance is how you define and enforce standards for how resources are created and operated. Governance answers questions like:

  • Where are teams allowed to deploy?
  • What naming, tagging, and security standards must every resource follow?
  • How do we detect and fix non-compliance over time?

Good governance is not “set it once.” It’s a continuous loop of defining standards, applying them consistently, monitoring compliance, and improving the rules as the environment and risks change.

In Azure, one common way to implement governance at scale is policy-driven controls. Azure Policy helps enforce organizational standards and assess compliance, and it includes examples like restricting deployments to allowed regions and requiring tags.

Security and governance work together:

  • Security controls focus on protecting resources and data from threats.
  • Governance controls focus on preventing risky or non-standard deployments and keeping the environment consistent as it grows.

Practical Understanding

Practical Situation 1: “We moved to the cloud, so security is handled for us”

A team migrates a workload and stops reviewing identity, permissions, network exposure, and data protection because they assume the provider “does security now.”

How to think about it: Cloud providers secure the platform, but you still secure what you control. You always own your data and identities, and you remain responsible for access management and the parts of the stack you configure.

Common misunderstanding: “Cloud means the provider does all security.” The provider secures the cloud; you secure your workload, configuration, and access.

Practical Situation 2: “Only approved regions and required tags”

An organization wants to block deployments outside approved regions and require tags (like cost center) on resources.

How to think about it: This is primarily governance. You are setting guardrails that make it harder to create non-standard resources and easier to stay consistent across teams. Azure Policy is one way Azure supports these kinds of rules.

Common misunderstanding: “Because security is involved, it’s only security.” Enforcing standards (regions, tags, baselines) across the whole environment is governance, even when the standards relate to security.

Practical Situation 3: “Production is locked down, dev is flexible”

Developers can deploy freely in development, but production changes are restricted to a smaller group. The organization also needs auditing to see who changed what.

How to think about it: This is security and governance together. Access restrictions are a security control (limiting who can change sensitive resources). Auditing and consistent rules across environments support governance by improving accountability and reducing drift.

Common misunderstanding: “Security and governance are the same thing.” They overlap, but security focuses on protection, while governance focuses on standards and guardrails across teams and time.

Practical Situation 4: “We have a policy, but we’re still non-compliant”

A policy exists, but it only reports non-compliance. Older resources remain out of standard until someone fixes them.

How to think about it: Governance is a lifecycle: define standards → apply/enforce → monitor → remediate. Reporting can be a deliberate first step, but governance still needs a plan to correct existing resources and keep compliance improving over time.

Common misunderstanding: “Turning on governance tools makes us compliant.” Tools help, but you still choose enforcement and follow through with monitoring and remediation.

Common Pitfalls

  • Mistake: Assuming cloud workloads are secure without configuring identity, access, and data protection. Correction: The shared responsibility model means you still secure what you control, and you always own your data and identities.

  • Mistake: Treating governance as optional until the environment gets “big enough.” Correction: Guardrails prevent drift early and reduce clean-up work later; governance is a continuous process, not a one-time project.

  • Mistake: Mixing up security controls and governance controls. Correction: Security protects resources and data from threats; governance sets and enforces standards for how resources are created and operated.

  • Mistake: Thinking policies only exist to block deployments. Correction: Policy can also assess compliance, report issues, and support remediation so standards are met at scale.

  • Mistake: Assuming compliance is “done” once templates/policies exist. Correction: Standards change, environments change, and governance needs monitoring and iteration to stay effective.

Check Your Understanding

  1. In your own words, explain the shared responsibility model using these two ideas: “provider secures the platform” and “customer secures what they control.”
  2. Write one example that is mainly a security problem and one that is mainly a governance problem. Explain why each fits.
  3. Describe how centralized security capabilities can reduce “inconsistent configurations across teams.”
  4. If an organization restricts deployments to approved regions, what risk(s) does that guardrail reduce, and why is this governance?
  5. Describe a simple compliance loop you would follow over time: standards → enforcement/reporting → monitoring → remediation.

Further Reading